Fees & execution
USDC gas, platform charges and the cost of a fill.
Maestro vs Sigma
Compare Maestro and Sigma for Arc. Both have active trading recorded; the table separates confirmed differences from unknowns.
Insufficient confirmed evidence
Too few mutually confirmed features to select a feature winner.
Interface languages: Maestro — English, Simplified Chinese · Telegram; Sigma — English, Chinese.
Basic comparison
| Confirmed feature | Maestro | Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| Interface languages | English, Simplified Chinese · Telegram | English, Chinese |
| Confirmed access surfaces | Telegram | Telegram, Web |
Pro view · confirmed controls and integrations
| Confirmed feature | Maestro | Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| Internal wallets | Yes · Telegram | Yes |
| Multiple wallets | Yes · Telegram | Yes |
| Wallet import | Yes · Telegram | Yes |
How to decide
Match the tool to an actual requirement, then check its fee quote and wallet setup.
22 comparison dimensions have at least one unverified value. Start with the controls you need for your Arc workflow, then use the official documentation linked from each bot guide. A lower platform fee alone does not establish a lower total execution cost.
Affiliate links may earn us a commission. How this works
Related Arc comparisons
Understand the context
DEXes & liquidity
Read the route, pool depth and launch stage.
Choose a trading bot
Match confirmed features to your workflow.
Maestro workflow on Arc
Reviewed 7 October 2026 · Arc scope
Trading costs
Maestro charges a product-wide 1% fee on successful manual and automated buys and sells. Network gas, priority fees or builder tips, DEX/protocol costs and bridge-provider fees are separate. Ordinary wallet transfers have no Maestro trading fee.
Execution and launch orders
Smart Slippage is a confirmed Arc buy-setting control, alongside manual slippage. Arc gas controls are denominated in nUSDC. The current AutoSnipe selector confirms SOL, BNB and ETH. It does not establish Arc sniping support.